RedOps Cyber Intelligence Group secures regulated mid-market firms across the full enterprise AI security lifecycle — governance, risk, model defense, and adversarial testing. Fractional CISO leadership and compliance delivery across NYDFS §500, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and NIST AI RMF.
AI oversight is now calendar-driven. A few of the forcing functions shaping 2026.
RedOps serves mid-market organizations — typically 100 to 2,000 employees — where adopting AI has outpaced the governance, evidence, and board reporting their regulators and enterprise customers now expect.
NYDFS- and NAIC-regulated carriers facing AI underwriting oversight and board reporting obligations.
Regulated payments and lending firms answering enterprise and cross-border AI security review.
HIPAA-covered organizations bringing AI into clinical, operational, and member-facing workflows.
Platform companies whose buyers now send AI security questionnaires alongside SOC 2.
Most security functions can answer questions about the network. Far fewer can answer the board's questions about AI. RedOps covers the full lifecycle — so governance, risk, defense, and testing reinforce one another instead of living in silos.
AI inventory, model risk policy, and board-ready oversight aligned to NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001.
A maintained model risk register and third-party AI diligence that hold up to examination.
Controls for prompt injection, data poisoning, and AI-specific incidents, mapped to MITRE ATLAS.
AI-augmented offensive testing that validates the program against how attackers actually operate.
Each engagement is scoped to a clear deliverable and a defined outcome — so you know exactly what you are buying and what lands on the board's desk.
A productized annual certification lifecycle for NY-regulated insurers and fintechs: evidence repository buildout, BEC and ransomware tabletop exercise, and board reporting.
The flagship retainer. A governance baseline, maintained AI inventory and model risk register, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001 alignment, and a quarterly posture review for the board.
Continuous, AI-augmented penetration testing on a defined cadence, with structured reporting and remediation tracking — modern coverage at mid-market economics.
A fixed-scope, six-to-eight-week entry engagement: AI use-case inventory, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001 gap analysis, a model risk policy stack, and a board-ready governance memo with a 90-day roadmap.
A behavioral threat-intelligence baseline, GenAI social-engineering simulation campaigns, a staff training program, and a detection pattern library — grounded in current research.
Pick the closest. We'll point you to the right entry engagement.
D.Cybersecurity, Capella University — research in GenAI social engineering and behavioral threat intelligence. Practice based in Long Island, NY, serving the NY metro and remote.
RedOps was built on a simple observation: across regulated mid-market firms, boards are now asking AI risk questions their security functions can't yet answer. Examiners expect AI to appear in board reporting. Enterprise buyers send AI security questionnaires alongside SOC 2. The gap between AI adoption and AI governance has become a business risk.
RedOps closes that gap. We provide fractional CISO leadership and productized AI security engagements that produce examination-ready evidence and board-ready reporting — not slideware. The work is grounded in regulated-vertical pattern recognition, from an NYDFS-regulated insurance carrier to an identity software vendor answering enterprise security review.
The differentiator is range: governance, risk, model defense, and adversarial testing under one accountable principal — informed by doctoral research into how AI changes the threat landscape, and an AI-augmented testing capability that validates the program against real adversary behavior.
Five quick questions. You'll get a posture snapshot across the dimensions boards and regulators now ask about — and where to focus first.
Plain-English writing on the regulations, vendor risk, and board questions shaping AI security for regulated firms.
A vulnerability dashboard can't answer a governance question. The six things a board-ready AI posture report actually contains — and what we find when we inventory AI inside a regulated firm.
Read the article → Third-party risk · AIA SOC 2 attests to the locks on the building — not to what your vendor's AI does with your data. The seven questions your vendor file can't answer, and why the cleanest audit is often the biggest blind spot.
Read the article →Start with a short scoping conversation. We'll map your AI footprint and regulatory exposure, then recommend the right entry point — no obligation.
Request a consultation →